Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 01:04

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
This Week In Space podcast: Episode 163 — The Trials of Starship - Space
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Scientists uncover key role of thyroid hormones in fear memory formation - PsyPost
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Fact-checking unsubstantiated claims linking Gov. Walz to Minnesota lawmakers’ shootings - PBS
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How do modern fantasy authors approach diversity differently than previous generations?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Liquid Glass is more than skin deep on macOS Tahoe - AppleInsider
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
2025 NBA Finals MVP Rankings: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Tyrese Haliburton and More - Bleacher Report